
It also occurred to me during the course of her presentation that she was contributing to a conversation that was heretofore totally missing from the Environmental Justice paradigm. Amy's presentation helped me to realize that this 'ecosexual' movement to bring sex and sexuality more directly into the environmental movement is not only about making the environmental movement more sexy, diverse and playful (all of which I consider to be very important and timely endeavors) but also about understanding issues of sex and sexuality as serious justice issues. Amy and I have made plans to collaborate in the near future.
What kinds of worlds are made possible if we take seriously the ideas of sexuality--and sex--as environmental justice issues? Could we perhaps think of sexuality and sexual enjoyment as human rights? Not only the right to choose one's sexual identity/embrace one's sexual orientation without facing discrimination, but also the right to sexual pleasure. This would include freedom from sexually destructive industrial toxics. I find this very intriguing and challenging in a nontrivial way. Is this pushing things too far? I don't think so, but at the same time I know there would have to be limits, or at least a meaningful ethical framework in which to understand sexual enjoyment as a human right. How might we imagine an environmental justice movement that includes an ethics of sexuality which explicitly incorporates the right to sexual pleasure into a broader anti-toxics environmental justice framework? Perhaps the time has come to recognize sexuality as a site of intervention for democratic and social justice movements that must incorporate not only sexual identity/orientation but also the right to ethically grounded sexual pleasure. I find this project quite exciting and I look forward to collaborating with Amy.
No comments:
Post a Comment